On 2009/03/28, at 12:18, Graham Percival wrote:
Tiger uses 2.3.5, which does *not*
support lilypond-book and convert-ly.
(we use set(), which was introduced in python 2.4)
You need 2.4 just because of the set container? If yes, you could
have imported Sets and used the set=Sets() constructor.
This is available in >= python 2.2. (no news for you, I guess)...
The ironic touch was -- I must say -- not productive. I believe apps
should check their dependencies and be self-contained. Nevertheless,
we can imagine how dreadful it would be to have an entire OS shipped
with every app. If a given program needs to use some other non
generic program it should ship it. If it runs on python or lisp or
any multi-purpose interpreter, the program should just check for the
minimal version and exit&error if not present.
It should *never* look for some specific filesystem path for that
program. It should always use the loaded $path.
This last simple thing is not done in lilypond-book. And this is not
stone-throwing, or else I was not offering myself to help in the
issue resolution.
Cláudia
|♪♫♪|♫♫|♪♫♪|
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
