Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com> writes: > Hi Alexander, On your point about technical restrictions: I would > just say that by the time a musician becomes a professional he/she has > read thousands of scores with rounded notes, non-pointy angles, heavy > dynamics font, etc.
[...] > playing music, which I obviously love, and less time doing what > amounts to bookkeeping-- clearing up ambiguities/misprints, adjusting > my eyes to a weird font, trying not to be distracted by stems that are > too heave/light, squinting at hair-thin lines, etc." Hair-thin lines are not for squinting. They are used, for example, in the "modern" font families for producing closed letter aesthetics with an "open lead" of the serif line. The idea of a vertical hair line is exactly to _not_ disturb the base line of lead fortified by serifs. You need good printing resolution to bring that intent to fruition. One reason to make music fonts low-res friendly is that scores, much more than most other materials, are likely to be photocopied. They are a musician's work material. Also, you often have just an angle of your sight to spare for them. The conductor will thank the typesetters if the score does not require the full focus of the musicians. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
