On Wed 06 Oct 2010, 07:44 David Kastrup wrote: > Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > > > On 10/5/10 5:50 PM, "Keith E OHara" <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote: > >> > >> If \cadenzaOff turns autobeaming on, then what about scores that turn off > >> autobeaming for the whole piece, but then (mis-)use short cadenzas? > > > > The CHANGES file informs the user that they will need to turn off > > autobeaming manually after the cadenza, as does the notation reference. > > > > I think this is the right thing to do. > > I think a revert would be more appropriate. Please, why?..
ps. I do believe that another issue may be pushed instead of reverting, enhancement request -- how autobeaming should work in cadenzas. Or, may be, enev another one --- it should be documented _how_ autobeaming works in cadenzas _now_? (before 1289). But for the moment it seems to be quite correct -- to switch autobeaming off and let user switch it on and specify beaming rules. I am not sure that i understand what's i am talking about .) But 1289 looks reasonable. Sorry for the noise. -- Dmytro O. Redchuk Bug Squad _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
