Comment #7 on issue 1294 by pnorcks: Version 2.13.35 does not properly
represent lyric tie
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1294
The regression test "lyric-tie.ly" also has this problem, as you can see on
the 2.13 regtest page.
Some observations:
- In the GUB regtest tarball for 2.13.35, I can see that lyric-tie.ly loads
a Japanese font, "Sazanami-Mincho-Regular", to use for the lyric tie. Just
look in lyric-tie.eps.
- Testing lyric-tie.ly locally, I installed this particular Japanese font,
compiled the regtest, and compared my generated EPS file with that from the
regtest tarball. They are *identical*, with a negligible bounding-box
difference, but a valid PNG is generated for me, whereas the PNG generated
for the docs is garbled (has small black squares instead of U+203F
glyphs). See the attached image.
Maybe this is a problem with Ghostscript in GUB? Not sure.
Attachments:
lyric-tie.preview.png 330 bytes
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond