On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Keith E OHara <k-oh...@oco.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:02:52 -0700, Keith E OHara wrote:
>
> The attached example is admittedly not tiny,
>>
>
> Feeling guilty about that, I stayed up a bit past my bedtime and found that
> extremely large stretchability does have effect.
>
> \version "2.13.37"
> \paper { last-bottom-spacing #'stretchability = #200 }
>
> m = \repeat unfold 40 r2
> \score {
> << \new Staff \m \new Staff \m \new Staff \m
> \new Staff \m \new Staff \m \new Staff \m
> \new Staff \m \new Staff \m \new Staff \m \new Staff \m >>
> }
>
> Given that stretchability defaults to be equal to space (typically 2-8
> staff spaces) a value of 200 seems extreme, but that is what it takes to let
> the springs between the staves compress a little.
>
The default space is 9 (in default-next-staff-spacing), so if you set
last-bottom-spacing stretchability to 25 (as you did originally), then it
will only want to stretch about 3 times as much as the distance between
staves. Since you have 10 staves and each one will stretch 1/3 as much as
the bottom space, the system will actually stretch about 3 times as much as
the bottom space. Since the system was bigger to begin with _and_ it
stretches much more, it will end up almost filling the page.
Cheers,
Joe
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
