Le 14/11/2010 17:17, Mark Polesky disait :
Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Do you mean that "It is the
@code{default-staff-staff-spacing} property of each
staff's @code{VerticalAxisGroup} grob that will be used
when @code{staff-staff-spacing} is defined neither in
@code{StaffGrouper} nor @code{VerticalAxisGroup}"?
Yes. However, there are still some changes coming to this
file. I probably should have warned the translators. See
http://codereview.appspot.com/3089042/. This particular
oddity was a by-product of the renaming convertrule. It is
addressed in the Rietveld post. I'll probably make Trevor's
suggestion and then push that patch today.
So, just a collateral victim.
OK. I just have to pull and carry over these adjustments...
I've not jumped deep into this (r)evolution; it was just this double
instance "both staff-staff-spacing and staff-staff-spacing" that made
happen the "tilt".
The other big adjustments to spacing.itely will be coming
from some version of this post
http://codereview.appspot.com/2758042/. But I'm not
finished with that one either.
Sometimes I feel bad for the translators when I make these
huge changes all at once.... But it's really a weird (and
neat) feeling to have my words reach people across
languages. I really appreciate all the work you've done and
are doing!
Too bad for me to have attacked spacing before input... I shall wait
before opening vocal!
Feel free to let me know if I have any annoying stylistic
idiosyncracies; sometimes I wonder if I overuse the
semi-colon, for example. (:
- Mark
As long as I make the point, I don't mind. Rephrasing is fully part of
the translation process!
And many thanks for this brainstorming that, in my very small opinion,
might help even non English speaking users.
Cheers,
Jean-Charles
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond