"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: > "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote in message > news:87y68dmy2e....@lola.goethe.zz... >> "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: >> >>> The PC is unusable when it's running - all the Ghostscript command >>> line interfaces get in the way. >> >> Huh? If you see Ghostscript command line interfaces, you are calling >> the wrong version of Ghostscript, or using the wrong options. >> >> For X, there is some executable called gsnd or so (Ghostscript no >> display), but you should not really need it if the devices are already >> set on the command line. For Windows, something like gswin32c is needed >> (the c is important). > > It's not me that calls Ghostscript, it's LilyPond.
Then it shouldn't. File a bug report and feel free to include the above hint. I don't have Windows available, so I can't make a proper report. I know that preview-latex had to do something like the above in order to drive Ghostscript as a "hidden" PostScript converter. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
