On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 01:21:17 -0800, Jan Warchoł <[email protected]> wrote:
I mean, this [A: extra space for flats ] looks to my eye worse than this [B: no extra space]
I agree. In tight spacing the tucking looks nice. This comparison is identical to the second line of the image I posted at the start of the thread, A: 2.12.3 B: 2.13.43 Now I have to be honest about my use of \noBreak. The two lines are within the spacings accepted by 2.13.43 (that is, \noBreak can be removed with no change). However, if we prevent the notes from tucking under flats (either with extra-spacing height or by using ver2.12.3) then LilyPond wants to split that tight line into two. So Lilypond tries to avoid the ugly A. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
