Status: Accepted
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low Frog
New issue 1493 by ralphbug...@gmail.com: Problem with horizontal beams
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1493
James Lowe :
There seems to be an inconsistency with setting horizontal beams.
We have a snippet where we state that
\override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
Should generate horizontal beams in all cases.
However the simple example attached shows some odd inconsistencies.
\version "2.13.40"
\relative c'' {
\override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g, % all beams horizontal
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g, % all beams horizontal
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g, % 2nd and 4th group not
Horizontal
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g, % 2nd and 4th group not
Horizontal
}
\relative c'' {
\override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g, \break % 4th group not
Horizontal
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g, \break % 2nd and 4th group
not Horizontal
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g, \break % 2nd and 4th group
not Horizontal
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g, \break % 2nd and 4th group
not Horizontal
}
Phil Holmes :
I'd suggest the snippet is worth sorting out, too. What do you reckon -
adding the commands
\override Beam #'details #'damping-direction-penalty = #0
\override Beam #'details #'round-to-zero-slope = #0
to the existing snippet, or a new one pointed to by the old one, that
says "if \override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0 doesn't do what you want, add
the other commands too, as shown here"?
Attachments:
screenshot.png 24.6 KB
beams.ly 807 bytes
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
