On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:06:52PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote: > My fault, Graham. I raised issue 1604 last night, and Mike posted a > patch on reitveld in response, this morning. Unusually for Mike, > bless his productive cotton socks, his posting on -devel actually > referred to 1604.
Whoops. My fault, then. > I see there is a feature request outstanding on the codereview issue > tracker, asking for grouping of issues by project, but that is a > halfway measure for us: our problems come from issues being reported > and discussed on any one, two, or all of three mailing lists, while > patches are discussed, but not trackable on a separate system > entirely. This incident may well serve as the classic example of the > problem. We certainly have problems, but this incident isn't an example of those. I was hurridly getting rid of emails at the kitchen table while water was boiling, and I didn't notice the all-important number 1604 when looking at Mike's emails. If I'd read it a little bit more carefully, there wouldn't have been any problem. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
