Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:40:08PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> lilyp...@googlecode.com writes: >> >> > In light of the discussion about this patch, how hard would it be to >> > make it controllable? I don't have a good idea of the name, since >> > IIRC we already have an extraNatural property. >> >> As long as not a single user _wants_ the old behavior, why bother? > > I thought that some people _did_ want that behavior. There is some > discussion about whether or not they _should_ want that behavior, but > if it's easy to accommodate them, I'd rather that lilypond allow > people to shoot themselves in the foot if they specifically request > it.
If there is no example of a composition using the feature except old Lilypond printouts, supporting this is a distraction in code and documentation. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
