lilypond-4 wrote:
>
> If I run the command above with 2.15.5, I get the output at the bottom.
> I'm not convinced that's correct.
>
> Unbound variable: t
> < \tweak #'transparent ##<unspecified> c e >
>
an old question: should it be ##t or just #t?
a small example to illustrate the dilemma (from the NR) - emphasized by me:
Controlling tuplet bracket visibility
The default behavior of tuplet-bracket visibility is to print a bracket
unless there is a beam
of the same length as the tuplet. To control the visibility of tuplet
brackets, set the property
'bracket-visibility to either #t (always print a bracket), #f (never print a
bracket) or
#'if-no-beam (only print a bracket if there is no beam).
music = \relative c'' {
\times 2/3 { c16[ d e } f8]
\times 2/3 { c8 d e }
\times 2/3 { c4 d e }
}
\new Voice {
\relative c' {
<< \music s4^"default" >>
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = #'if-no-beam
<< \music s4^"'if-no-beam" >>
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
<< \music s4^"#t" >>
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f
<< \music s4^"#f" >>
}
}
\displayLilyMusic also reacts differently on each.
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Issue-1733-in-lilypond%3A-%5CdisplayLilyMusic-ignores-%5Ctweak-tp31983686p32125152.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
