2011/7/31 Janek Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com>: > > Wow, i'm CCed! Why?
You are on my list as aesthetic guru (+ good engraving practices). And also because Gmail's "Consider including" feature suggested me to Cc you (and finally because it usually makes the person reply to the message, which is good in order to hear its opinions). > > […] > > I think i agree that full measure rest should take the same amount of > space as full measure note. :) On 31 July 2011 13:02, Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> wrote: > > Gould and Read both strongly imply that a WMR should take up the same space > as the equivalent note: we could discuss whether this is always a > semi-breve, or whether it represents the timed length of the note in other > time sigs than 4/4. Gould says "Position a rest exactly as if it were a > note of equivalent duration" [except] "the semi-breve rest is placed at the > visual centre of the bar". Read says "Written rests [..] are always given a > time-value: that is, the rest symbols merely substitute for a written note > value." Thank you Phil. Since it seems I'm not the only one to consider that Full measure rest should take more horizontal space (as much horizontal space as a note of the same duration), could someone open a new issue for this on the tracker? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Scheuer <x.sche...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond