Am Tuesday, 16. August 2011, 12:06:30 schrieben Sie: > Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@kainhofer.com> writes: > > I think the lys-to-tely call should stay one call. However, it would > > be quite simple to write the filenames to a file and pass that to > > lys-to-tely (like we do it in lilypond-book already for compiling the > > snippets). > > If we can't pass the filenames to a call of lys-to-tely because of > command line length limits, I don't see us passing the filenames to > "echo" or similar shell commands more easily in order to write them to a > file.
Well, first, maybe we can find a way to pipe the list to a file, so the list never appears in a shell command. If that doesn't work, then we can always split the list into smaller chunks, write each junk to the file and then call lys-to-tely on the file containing all filenames. Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
