Updates:
        Labels: -Patch-review Patch-needs_work

Comment #6 on issue 509 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: collision nested tuplet numbers
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=509

Mike Solomon on Rietveld:
Sorry to not have pushed this yet, but I recently rebased this against current master and it looks like my stem work actually fixed a good deal of what some of this patch was fixing. I've gotten rid of about half the code from this patch
and posted a new version.

For now, this is just a sketch - it passes regtests, but it does not allow for some of the fine tuning that was in the previous patch (tuplet numbers now push
tuplet brackets much higher than they used to, invalidating the need for all
that skyline stuff from previous patches, thus the deletions). I'm not sure yet why this fine tuning doesn't happen, but I'll figure it out in a couple weeks.

In any case, moxy nested tuplets won't be part of LilyPond for at least another month, 3-4 weeks, but when they are, they'll be fully integrated with the new
Stem work.

Cheers,
MS


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to