Updates:
Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-new
Comment #4 on issue 2018 by d...@gnu.org: Patch: parser.yy: allow
postevents in function arguments in general
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2018
I don't particularly like "Patch-needs_work: Review has identified some
problems" status when the only "problem" is that the patch is based (and
consequently blocked) on another patch.
It keeps people from reviewing the patch, and the whole point of uploading
it was getting it reviewed. So I am flagging this as Patch-new again. If
that triggers some automatic procedure that fails, we need to redesign our
procedures. "Blocked on" should be considered similar to "Needs_work"
regarding the progression of automatic testing.
Of course, it would be even nicer if the patch _was_ tested on top of the
blocking issue patch whenever the blocking issue patch moves to
Patch-review, but that would also mean that this patch gets back
to "Patch-new" whenever the blocking issue gets an updated patch. Complex.
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
