"Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote in message
news:20111129223202.GB12298@chikara...
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 02:28:45PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote:
"Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote in message
news:20111129015547.GA2763@chikara...
>I honestly believe that less than 50% of bug squad volunteers are
>actively working after 4 weeks. Am I incorrect as a matter of
>fact?
I don't know the history. I believe the current squad, as shown on
the CG, has 100% active members.
Don't believe, *demonstrate*. It's Christmas time -- we can
find out who's been naughty and nice.
https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra/tree/master/bug-squad
Not that I suggest it's time to freak out if some new helpers are
less active than others; it's only been a week or two, so they can
legitimately still be reading the CG. But I really want to
encourage you and Carl to run those scripts; there should be no
guesswork / estimation / belief about this. You should check the
records once a week or two, and actively ask volunteers if they
need clarification if they fall behind.
I don't generally run this, since, as you know, my main working environment
is Windows and Outlook Express (!). However, I made my statement based on
other aspects of being "active" - emails to me concerning the rota,
questions about the CG, verifying issues - none of which the script checks,
IIRC. On that basis, all bug squad members are currently active.
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
