On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:54:12AM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote: > > trying to compile a function manipulating the NoteColumn with "2.15.20" I > noticed some differences to "2.14.2" > So I wrote a test-function to display the grob-length: > > \version "2.14.2" > %\version "2.15.20" > > #(define (x-length-of-grob grob) > (let* ((sys (ly:grob-system grob)) > (grob-length (interval-length (ly:grob-extent grob sys X)))) > (newline) > (display grob-length))) > > \relative c' { > \override NoteColumn #'after-line-breaking = #x-length-of-grob > <c e>4 > <c e>4. > <c eis>4 > <c eis>4\arpeggio > } > > With "2.14.2" I get: > 1.316178 > 1.316178 > 1.316178 > 1.316178 > > With "2.15.20" I get: > 1.316178 > 1.316178 > 1.316178 > 2.616182 > > > It seems that in "2.15.20" the arpeggio is part of the NoteColumn. (But not > the DotColumn or the AccidentalPlacement) > The IR 3.2.71 note-column-interface states only stems and noteheads.
I'm unable to determine if this is a legitimate bug report or not. Could one of the devs advise, please? Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond