lilyp...@googlecode.com writes:
> Comment #4 on issue 2099 by gra...@percival-music.ca: texi2pdf --quiet
> hides too much
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2099
>
> if it's undefined in texinfo, then why did makeinfo accept it with no
> fuss?
> Anyway, in this case I would rather use @verbatim. Bash prompts are
> complicated enough as they are; I don't want some poor documentation
> editor in a few years from now copying the version from the source and
> trying to figure out why that bash prompt doesn't work for him.
As if a double @@ in the prompt would be hard to diagnose.
> And chances are that anybody working on that part of the documentation
> will *not* be familiar with bash, or even texinfo.
There is no point to trying to avoid using Texinfo in a Texinfo document
for the sake of people who would like to avoid Texinfo.
You can't copy&paste Lilypond examples either without changing @{ and @}
back.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
