On 29/12/11 11:13, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote: > > Comment #6 on issue 2149 by m...@apollinemike.com: Patch: Creates > non-negative-integer? predicate. > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2149 > > I'll change it to whatever people think would be easiest - I really > have no preference, but I do think it's important to have a > user-friendly predicate if LilyPond is to use the box-integral > method to create vertical skylines for other objects. Why not call it /positive-integer?/ and state in the docstring it defines any integer i where i >= 0 as positive. Or if you want to stick to Guiles /positive?/, maybe use /positive-integer-or-zero?/.
Predicate names seem to work better if they describe what they're testing for rather than what's being avoided. <Bad pun alert> It's better of they're positive . . . </Bad pun alert> Cheers, Ian _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
