On 1 January 2012 14:47, Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> wrote: > If the headword explained this, it would be fine, but it doesn't and > therefore makes it look wrong. We don't use other archaic words unless > there's a clear reason?
It's a real music example (of a particularly famous piece), so should follow the practice of the majority of editions. Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
