lilyp...@googlecode.com writes: > Updates: > Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Critical > > Comment #7 on issue 2256 by gra...@percival-music.ca: empty strings: > tabStaff insists on stringnumbers and looses notes > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2256 > > according to the CG, any regression since the last TWO stable releases > is Critical.
Sorry for the messup. I see that you corrected the other similar mistake already. I don't fully understand the rationale for holding up a release because of something that did not work in the last release either. But that does not really matter since we certainly had a discussion about that already before the policy went into the CG. I misremembered, so sorry for the unwarranted change. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
