lilyp...@googlecode.com writes: > Updates: > Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push > > Comment #9 on issue 451 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Enhancement: a more > flexible \parallelMusic syntax when used with \relative > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=451 > > I suppose the whole "Countdown complete, please push" process would > greatly be enhanced by actually marking the patch as "patch-push", > wouldn't it? Sorry, David!
Well, for those feeble-minded developers just scanning over their mail, and at some point of time doing the respective work by looking at the issue list, it would likely be a mental aid. Of course, it also does not quite help that the default action of git-cl when creating a patch issue does not assign ownership, so I tend to look for "Issues with comment by me" and "Patch:push" rather than "Issues owned by me". Anyway, thanks for the reminder. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
