On 2012-02-15 19:18, David Kastrup wrote:
Reinhold Kainhofer<reinh...@kainhofer.com> writes:
This example will silently discard the outer slur.
The number of times where I have to contradict you today is impressive.
No, it won't. Both get typeset.
Oops, you are right. Your patch not only fixes the warning, but also
implements concurrent slurs that start at the same moment...
LGTM.
I'm currently trying to clean up the backlog of lilypond messages of the
last 10 days (~800 mails), so I spend hardly any time cross-checking...
I simply saw that the message was no longer printed for that case, and I
assumed that concurrent slurs were still disallowed and the second slur
discarded.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial& Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
