Comment #31 on issue 2335 by prze...@gmail.com: 64 bit LilyPond segfaults
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2335

Adding empty lines does not help (I tried it almost immediately at the beginning, even before reporting the issue).

Just in case someone overlooked it, I repeat what I wrote in my original mail. Redirecting output to a file or piping it to other process (stdout alone is enough, yes, the one that is not used...), makes segfault go away too.

Graham, would it be possible to build LilyPond in the same way as provided binaries are built, but w/o stripping debug symbols? It could possibly help a bit in tracking it down (or not, who knows...).


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to