Hello, On 22 April 2012 08:22, Thomas Scharkowski <t.scharkow...@t-online.de> wrote: > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > >> Hello, >> >> On 21 April 2012 21:30, Thomas Scharkowski<t.scharkow...@t-online.de> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm not top posting. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Documentation version: 2.15 >>>> Chapter: I’m hearing Voices >>>> Issue type: Uncritical, but more logical >>>> >>>> Original German text: >>>> >>>> "...wenn es sich bei den Noten um hauptsächlich homophone Musik handelt, >>>> in der >>>> hier und da polyphone Stellen vorkommen." >>>> >>>> Change "homophone Musik" to "monophone Musik". >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> JUHO >>>> >>> >>> I think there is some confusion in the original english version - you can >>> use several simultanuous notes in a single voice, so "homophonic" is more >>> suitable than "monophonic". >> >> >> Unless those notes in that single voice all '...move in parallel >> rhythm and pitch....' in which case it is monophonic. >> > Yes. > >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homophony >> >> >> I'm no scholar (or singer) but I am guessing that 'mono..' was used >> here as distinct to 'poly..' (i.e. monophony vs polyphony)? >> >> James >> > So "mono..." is wrong in this context. >
and so the correct term is .... ? james _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
