Mark Witmer <mark.d.wit...@gmail.com> writes:
> David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> you might consider rephrasing the ly:make-book
>> call as #{ \book { ... } #} as well, peeling off another Scheme layer
>> and leaving just ly:book-process.
>>
>
>
> Thanks! That did the trick. I'm glad to see this code works in 2.16.0;
> putting \score inside of a scheme expression was giving me errors in
> 2.14.2
Yes, it would.
From
<URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/changes/index.html>
The construct #{ … #} can now be used not just for constructing
sequential music lists, but also for pitches (distinguished from
single note events by the absence of a duration or other information
that can’t be part of a pitch), single music events, void music
expressions, post events, markups (mostly freeing users from having
to use the markup macro), markup lists, number expressions, context
definitions and modifications, and a few other things. If it
encloses nothing or only a single music event, it no longer returns
a sequential music list but rather a void music expression or just
the music event itself, respectively.
Granted, books and scores are not listed explicitly but rather as "and a
few other things". Perhaps a bit reckless.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
