Colin Hall writes: > Thomas Morley writes: >> >> Hi Colin, >> >> I see three bugs
I have created two additional trackers, see links in line below. >> (1) >> The markup-commands \note-by-number and \note don't support other >> flag-styles than default. >> >> This will result in ugly output. >> I'd consider this of type: enhancment. >> >> Example: >> >> \version "2.17.9" >> >> \markup { >> \override #'(style . mensural) >> { >> \note-by-number #3 #0 #1 >> \note #"8" #1 >> } >> } See tracker 3104 for (1) above. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3104 >> (2) >> `format-metronome-markup' and `metronome-markup' from >> /scm/translation-functions.scm don't support other note/flag-styles >> than default. >> (Even if \note-by-number would support them.) >> >> (Can't imagine an example) >> >> This is part of the problem Karol reported initially. >> I'd consider this of type: enhancment. See the tracker I created a few days ago which I have re-titled to assign it to (2) above. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3096 >> (3) >> In mensural-style the stem and flag aren't well combined. >> >> Example: >> >> \version "2.17.9" >> >> { >> \override Flag.style = #'mensural >> \override Stem.thickness = #1.0 >> \override NoteHead.style = #'mensural >> c'8 >> } >> >> I'd consider this of type ugly. > For this last bug, see tracker 3105. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3105 Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond