"m...@mikesolomon.org" <m...@mikesolomon.org> writes: > Find #3 was wrong. There should have been no suicides in this precise > case. LilyPond just does not know how to do spacing on empty > skylines. This makes sense, as it is difficult to estimate the > distance between something and nothing. So, I'll use my previous > solution of flattening the skyline to 0 with a nice comment.
That sounds nonsensical. A skyline should be able to contain empty stretches or be completely empty; that should be "neutral", namely let any neighboring skyline take over. A skyline flattened to 0, however, will kill the neighboring skyline and replace it with its maximum/minimum. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
