Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> writes: > Frédéric Bron writes: > >> It is due to a bug in ghostscript. I submitted a bug report 29th of >> Nov (2012) and it is now corrected. But it will take time until the >> new version of ghostscript comes to everybody's distribution. > > Do you have a patch to go with this? We could put the patch into GUB > right away.
LilyPond degrades its encoding ASCII->Latin1->UTF16LE for PDF metadata. Old versions of GhostScript can't deal with UTF16LE. Recent versions balk at Latin1. We could likely temporarily improve user experience by skipping the Latin1 phase. It's a bit of a gamble. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
