Tobias Hoffmann <lfile-l...@thax.hardliners.org> writes:
> Nevertheless I tried your patch as far as possible and it produces the
> following emmentaler-20.subfonts file (fontforge compiles this as-is
> into the LILF table), which LGTM:
> feta20 feta-noteheads20 feta-flags20 parmesan20
> parmesan-noteheads20 feta-alphabet20
>
> But I noticed that the generated dependency files also have some
> problems, for example take emmentaler-20.dep:
> emmentaler-20.otf: $(outdir)/feta20.pfa \
> $(outdir)/parmesan20.pfa \
> $(outdir)/feta-alphabet20.pfa feta20.otf-table \
> $(outdir)/feta-alphabet20.pfa feta20.otf-gtable
>
> Notice that feta-alphabet20.pfa appears twice,
I'd guess that's uncritical.
> and some of the other subfonts do not...
I'd guess that's rather bad.
> Even worse: The actually generated and merged Type 1 font are *.pfb ,
> not *.pfa !
That does definitely sound subterrific.
> I don't really understand the bigger picture of lilyponds build
> process,
Neither does LilyPond: we have intermittent problems with parallel
builds, likely due to bad dependencies. So if you are willing to
investigate and propose fixes/patches, you are not likely to meet
resistance.
> but from what I see, I'd suggest the subfonts-array to be defined
> somewhere at the top of gen-emmentaler-script.py, and then to generate
> not only the .subfonts - files, but also the dependencies and the
> MergeFonts directives from it. I'm not sure about the
> MergeFonts("feta-alphabet...") though, I seems to be deliberately
> after the SetUnicodeValue-loop...
Julien, any idea?
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
