2013/11/29 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>:
> Maybe you should try making your bug reports not riddles. The main
> visible difference is that DrumStaff has a drum clef, so "Shouldn't
> these two yield identical results?" is very likely _not_ to focus the
> attention on where you want it.
Well, in my opinion both differences were equally visible.
Nevermind.
> For RhythmicStaff, the bar lines are explicitly designed to match those
> of a five-line staff.
I see the override in ly/engraver-init.ly, and i tracked the code back
to its first appearance 12 years ago:
commit 1539b48e9bd7cd7698e602dc3d3dbe74a6567a49
Author: Han-Wen Nienhuys <han...@xs4all.nl>
Date: Sat Sep 8 20:11:09 2001 +0200
release: 1.5.9
but i haven't found any rationale _why_ rhythmic staff barlines should
be so long.
> In contrast, DrumStaff has normal bar lines matching the system, and
> linecounts of 1 and smaller lead to the fallback of 3-line system
> dimensions.
>
> Personally, I find the RhythmicStaff bar lines a bit excessive. But
> changing them would be _quite_ an incompatible change.
Hmm. I think we should change it. The default behaviour (i.e.
ensuring that the barline is at least 2 ss long) seems perfect to me.
Janek
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
