Am 05.07.2014 16:49, schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 05.07.2014 15:50, schrieb Jean-Charles Malahieude:
Hi all,
On my way in updating translations, I notice that this style seems to
not do what it claims.
Look at the two successive examples in NR-1.1.3 Automatic
accidentals, both styles dodecaphonic and dodecaphonic-no-repeat:
there is no difference at all.
That's right, this is a bug, and I will look into it. I'm not on the
right PC to check right now, but I strongly assume it's an issue with
the doc example and not with the accidental style.
Urs
It seems this accidental-style is actually broken.
The doc example is coded correctly, and testing the accidentalstyle in a
document turns out the same result.
I know that it worked correctly when we added it, so it must have been
broken later.
So it should be added as a bug.
To avoid misunderstandings:
cis d cis cis d
should print as
cis! d! cis! \once \omit Accidental cis d!
Urs
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
