On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Trevor Daniels <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> wrote:
> > Noeck wrote Wednesday, March 25, 2015 6:48 PM > > > Here is a guess what happens (even if that contradicts the docs): > > The following pitches are perhaps not relative to the octave check but > > to the previous pitch corrected by the octave check. > > That would be my explanation too. > > > This would explain it, but the docs would have to be corrected. > > Yes, it's a doc issue. But is it really useful in this form? > Does anyone use it? Greetings, Trevor, Noeck, et al. - Submitted as Issue 4338 : https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4338 Ralph _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond