On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Trevor Daniels <t.dani...@treda.co.uk>
wrote:

>
> Noeck wrote Wednesday, March 25, 2015 6:48 PM
>
> > Here is a guess what happens (even if that contradicts the docs):
> > The following pitches are perhaps not relative to the octave check but
> > to the previous pitch corrected by the octave check.
>
> That would be my explanation too.
>
> > This would explain it, but the docs would have to be corrected.
>
> Yes, it's a doc issue.  But is it really useful in this form?
> Does anyone use it?


Greetings, Trevor, Noeck, et al. -
Submitted as Issue 4338 :
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4338

Ralph
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to