On 06/05/15 16:04, ArnoldTheresius wrote: > James Lowe wrote >> ... >> Or add a note in the documentation in the appropriate place? >> >> James >> >> _______________________________________________ >> bug-lilypond mailing list > >> bug-lilypond@ > >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond > > I think, adding to the documantion is good enough. > > Perhaps my words on the 'concept of the \postscript markup' are not > the best ones (esp. for people without deeper postscript experience), > but this information should be a good start for a documentation. Maybe > an image can illustrate some of the 'embeding conditions'. > > If you use 'findfont ... show' you do not need to insert a 'newpath' before. > If you define a postscript subroutine which 'stroke's or 'fill's a path, it > is > always wise to include the 'newpath' into your postscript subroutine. > So, I'm NOT missing an 'emptied stroke path' at all. > > ArnoldTheresius > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/PostScript-circle-printed-with-unwanted-line-tp175881p176235.html > Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > bug-lilypond mailing list > bug-lilypond@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond > >
Thanks, I've added https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4392 James _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond