so why is it not failing with Fedora 21? Fedora 21 and 22 use the same
Pango version?
MT
On 29 mei 2015 2:05:16 PM Jon Ciesla <limburg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Masamichi HOSODA <truer...@sea.plala.or.jp>
wrote:
> > The Fedora 22 package fails for everyone, the www.lilypond.org version
> > works.
> >
> > I tried this minimal example:
> >
> > % f22test.ly
> > \version "2.19.21"
> > {c'}
> >
> > And then did
> >
> > $ lilypond --ps --verbose f22.ly &> f22test1.txt
> > $ ps2pdf14 f22test.ps f22test.pdf &> f22test2.txt
> >
> > results: see attachment.
> > f22test1.txt f22test2.txt f22test.ps
>
> Thank you for your files.
>
> I suspect an issue of pango package of fedora 22.
>
> First, I've tried your f22test.ps on my environment with gs-9.15.
> It is failed. That is, it is not gs-9.16's issue.
> The result is following.
>
> ```
> $ ps2pdf14 f22test.ps f22test.pdf
> Error: /undefinedresult in --glyphshow--
> Operand stack:
> 0.6146 5.6906 -2.8453 space
> Execution stack:
> %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval--
> --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval--
> --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1967 1 3 %oparray_pop
> 1966 1 3 %oparray_pop 1950 1 3 %oparray_pop 1836 1 3
> %oparray_pop --nostringval-- %errorexec_pop .runexec2
> --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push
> --nostringval-- 0 --nostringval-- %repeat_continue --nostringval--
> Dictionary stack:
> --dict:1186/1684(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:108/200(L)--
> Current allocation mode is local
> Last OS error: No such file or directory
> Current file position is 131424
> GPL Ghostscript 9.15: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
>
> ```
>
> Then, I've found problems of f22test.ps.
> Broken f22test.ps sets font size to zero.
> Using the patch file for f22test.ps that is attached to this mail,
> ps2pdf14 is succeed.
>
> If I understand correctly, LilyPond gets the font size from pango.
> www.lilypond.org version LilyPond bundles pango that has no problem,
> and always uses it.
>
> Fedora 22's packaged LilyPond uses fedora 22's packaged pango?
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
> Yes, it does. I'll add the above to the bug report and reassign to pango.
Thanks!
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond