On Friday, July 10, 2015 01:43:22 AM David Kastrup wrote: > Thomas Spuhler <thomas.spuh...@btspuhler.com> writes: > > On Friday, July 10, 2015 12:42:32 AM David Kastrup wrote: > >> Thomas Spuhler <thomas.spuh...@btspuhler.com> writes: > >> > On Friday, July 10, 2015 12:28:53 AM you wrote: > >> >> ice-9/eval.scm is a file from GUILE 2.0. LilyPond requires compilation > >> >> with GUILE 1.8.8. LilyPond would not even have made it across the > >> >> configure stage with GUILE 2.0 without particular options and care, and > >> >> it never would have run. So I doubt that there is something new with > >> >> LilyPond that is causing a problem for you. Either this never worked in > >> >> this manner, or the person responsible for getting it to run previously > >> >> should immediately report for duty at LilyPond central since over _here_ > >> >> GUILE 2.0 is still an unsolved problem. > >> > > >> > David, version 2.19.21 actually built. I haven't done any testing, but > >> > will. > >> > > >> > There is a strong push for Guile 2 from our community (lilypond being > >> > the last package still > >> > requiring? guile-1.8 > >> > So I need strong arguments for no using guile-2 such as the package is > >> > not working. > >> > >> Well, the current situation for guile-2 definitely is "the package is > >> not working". There are quite fewer impediments to "is not working" > >> than there were a year ago: there has been active work in that area. > >> But those that remain are not trivial. > > > > I see the musicxml's don't convert > > Unmodified LilyPond should not even start up due to encoding problems. > This may depend on the actual version of GUILE 2.x however.
I converted about 10 .ly files to pdf using the regression files from the WEB site and the pdf's look OK. This is from a lilypond-2.19.21 build This is what's installed on the build box and run box $ rpm -qa |grep guil lib64guilereadline18_18-2.0.9-5.mga5 guile-2.0.9-5.mga5 lib64guile-devel-2.0.9-5.mga5 guile-runtime-2.0.9-5.mga5 lib64guile2.0_22-2.0.9-5.mga5 -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
