tisimst <tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > On 8/26/2015 4:45 PM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote: >> tisimst <[hidden email] >> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=180230&i=0>> writes: >> > - CompositeStaff >> > - HybridStaff >> > - StaffBlend >> > - AssortedStaff >> > >> > Maybe "StaffAxis" is the best one. >> >> Of those? Probably. Not that it's all that good. I like OneStaff >> better. > > I think I'll put my vote is in for that, too, unless a more descriptive > one comes up. I think that's what I feel is missing, more description in > the name to make it more obvious to a new user. "StaffContainer"? > >> > Is the purpose just to fix the vertical alignment issue? >> >> Uh, it's not a bug workaround. It's a feature. It's sole purpose is to >> use common Y coordinates for all contained staves. There are a number >> of uses for that, for both parallel and immediately successive contexts. > > Poor word choice on my part. I didn't mean to suggest it was a bug. I'm > pretty sure I understand what it does for successive contexts, but I'm > not sure what it does for parallel ones. Can you show an example?
How about the regtest included in the patch? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
