ID: 4578 STATUS: Accepted SUMMARY: Regtest "dynamics-broken-hairpin.ly" is self-contradictory TYPE: Maintainability LABELS: OWNER: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%% start message body %%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
The regtest "dynamics-broken-hairpin.ly" has some contradictions within itself.
The description says:
\header{
texidoc = "Broken crescendi should be open on one side."
}
but the code reads
\relative {
c''1 \< \break c1\! \> \break c1\!
}
so each hairpin actually ends before line break and there are no broken
hairpins.
To match the regtest title, the code should read
\relative {
c''1 \< \break
c
c\> \break
c
c\!
}
(output attached)
– but then the ‘inner’ broken parts are open to both sides, as they should
be. So this should be described as
\header {
texidoc = "When a hairpin is broken, the broken parts should be open at the
‘breaking point’."
}
So, whatever this regtest was designed for, either it needs a clearer
description matching its original intent or different code with a new
description.
Best regards, Simon
dynamics-broken-hairpin.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
