On 25.09.2015 21:36, David Kastrup wrote:
Simon Albrecht <[email protected]> writes:
Thank you.
Issue 4618 has been updated.
[...]
That's awkward, sorry I should have made this quite more explicit: this
was supposed to be a new issue. But it needs the patch from issue 4618
to work, so that patch was rolled into the Rietveld review as well in
order to allow for testing this patch.
What would the alternative be? Closing 4618 as Invalid and opening a new
one which does contain the code in question for 4618? I found it more
sensible that way, but if there is a problem with this now, I can redo it.
Yours, Simon
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
