On 07.12.2015 17:15, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Sorry; I retract this email. It's rubbish! All that does is invalidate the
autobeaming.
Nevertheless, a valuable hint that there is no problem without
beamExceptions. Which also explains why the problem would be limited to
quavers.
<https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4690/>
Yours, Simon
Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk>
To: "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org>; <bug-lilypond@gnu.org>; "Simon Albrecht"
<simon.albre...@mail.de>
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: Manual bar breaks autoBeaming
Simon Albrecht wrote Monday, December 07, 2015 1:32 PM
The report was (supposed to be) about the missing beam over the first
two quavers, which are not separated by a bar line.
To clarify:
\version "2.19.32"
{
\time 3/4
8-"default" 8 16 16 16 16 8 8
8-"with bars" 8 \bar "" 16 16 16 16 \bar "" 8 8
}
This is definitely a bug, and an interesting one!
If I copy out the 3/4 beam exceptions data structure from
scm/time-signature-settings.scm and place it in the score:
{
\time 3/4
\set Timing.beamExceptions =
#'((3 . 4) .
((beamExceptions . ((end . ((1/8 . (6))
(1/12 . (3 3 3))))))))
8-"default" 8 16 16 16 16 8 8
8-"with bars" 8 \bar "" 16 16 16 16 \bar "" 8 8
}
then the beams are correct. So it seems the beam exceptions
are not being accessed correctly.
Trevor
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond