Hi Paul,
Finally, after all types of trials, using 'stencil-scale is definitely the
best workaround to reach an acceptable note head output:
#(set-global-staff-size 180) %% <= below scales and offsets were set at
#(set-global-staff-size 300) and controlled at zoom #2000
#(set-default-paper-size "a4" 'landscape)
\layout {
indent = 0
\context {
\Staff
\omit Clef
\omit TimeSignature
}
}
\relative {
\override NoteHead.stencil =
#(lambda (grob) (ly:stencil-scale (ly:note-head::print grob) 0.980
0.924))
\override NoteHead.extra-offset = #'(0 . -.001)
d'4*1/2 f2*1/4 a1*1/8 c\breve*1/16 e\longa*1/32
}
Cheers,
Pierre
2016-02-10 6:05 GMT+01:00 Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com>:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> On Feb 9, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
> pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Some thoughts regarding the use of ly:stencil-scale:
> 1. the command seems to have a side effect on the stem attachment (or
> probably no effect on the note head extents - tested on a W8 OS)
> 2. applying it on all note heads suppose that all glyphs have the same
> scale defects (which is not the case, see my example with the harmonic
> style).
>
> So here's my attempt to get something liable to all note head styles.
> Unfortunately I did note find any direct procedure to get the 'default
> style ( '() do not work):
>
>
> Well, I was only intending that code for testing purposes. Looks like
> you’ve got a good start on something for actual use.
>
> Cheers,
> -Paul
>
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
