"Thomas Morley" <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:CABsfGyWZNStwtsKbot4xkjfromJuP9+NpPP7=8m+7qubmi3...@mail.gmail.com...
2016-10-12 15:45 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net>:
(Tried to send this to -devel, but nothing arrived).
See the attached ME:
music = { c''1 \mark \default c''1 \mark #6 c''1 c''1 \mark \default c''1
\mark \default c''1 \mark \default c''1 }
\new Score \with {
\remove "Mark_engraver"
\remove "Staff_collecting_engraver"
}
{
\new Staff \with { \consists "Mark_engraver" \consists
"Staff_collecting_engraver" }
{ \music }
}
\new Score \with {
}
{
\new Staff
{ \music }
}
As the attached image shows, the mark numbering is incorrect in the first
score. Anyone know why?
--
Phil Holmes
Hi Phil,
you wrote two Scores, the first moves the relevant engravers to Staff
level.
In the first Score the RehearsalMarks appear on top of the Staff
(which is also the top-Staff of Score)
In the second they appear on top of the top-Staff of the Score.
All as it should be. But no visible diference, because each Score has
only one Staff.
But see a difference here:
music = { c''1 \mark \default c''1 \mark #6 c''1 c''1 \mark \default
c''1 \mark \default c''1 \mark \default c''1 }
%% first Score
\new Score \with {
\remove "Mark_engraver"
\remove "Staff_collecting_engraver"
}
{
<<
\new Staff
{ \music }
\new Staff \with { \consists "Mark_engraver" \consists
"Staff_collecting_engraver" }
{ \music }
}
%% second Score
\new Score \with {
}
{
<<
\new Staff
{ \music }
\new Staff
{ \music }
}
Maybe best you tell what you really want to achieve.
The second score is "numbered" A F G H J, in line with the \mark #6 in the
music. The first score is "numbered" A B C D E using the same input. I
would have expected it to be A F G H J?
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond