On 08/17/17 09:23, David Kastrup wrote:
Touching the font cache when converting the documentation with Ghostscript from PS to PDF might just be a side effect of running the system's Ghostscript. In that case, it would be more a problem of BSD than of LilyPond.
No, it's not ghostscript. My OP has the full stack identifying the line. It is called from the lilypond executable.
Yuri _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
