David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > >> 2018-06-02 13:04 GMT+02:00 David Baptista <david.burgo.bapti...@gmail.com>: >>> Good morning to all, I have recently picked up an unexpected behaviour when >>> using the articulate script in conjuction with tremolo and ties. Here is a >>> minimal example: >>> >>> \include "articulate.ly" >>> >>> \score{ >>> c'1:16~ c'1:16 >>> \layout{} >>> } >>> >>> \score{ >>> \articulate { c'1:16~ c'1:16 } >>> \layout{} >>> } >>> >>> When this type of notation appears in scores, the meaning is that the >>> tremolo is to last (in this example) for 2 measures. But the resulting >>> output of articulate has one long sustained note with tremolo only in the >>> second measure. I suspect the underlying bug is that the tied C is being >>> replicated resulting in a sequence of tied Cs, but musically this is an >>> incorrect behaviour. >>> >>> I reproduced this bug both in the latest stable (2.18.2) and unstable >>> (2.19.48) release. >> >> >> Hi, >> >> to me it looks more like a problem of \unfoldRepeats: >> >> mus = { >> \repeat tremolo 16 c'16 >> ~ >> \repeat tremolo 16 c'16 >> } > > This is misleadingly formatted since it is interpreted as > > mus = { > \repeat tremolo 16 > c'16~ > \repeat tremolo 16 > c'16 > } > > My own gut feeling is that c'1:16~ is supposed to mean something > different, applying ~ to the whole rather than its parts. But what with > things like ( \( ) \) -. -- and such? > >> So a fix may be tricky. > > We'd need to figure out what stuff means before fixing it.
Probably worth pointing out that x:y produces a TremoloEvent (not fazed in any manner by \expandRepeats) while \repeat tremolo produces a TremoloRepeatedMusic event. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond