Am Mi., 8. Mai 2019 um 01:11 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > > Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Am Mi., 8. Mai 2019 um 00:25 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > >> > >> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> > I tried a quick adhoc coding. > >> > > >> > Works with \unfoldRepeats, regrettable prints nothing without it. > >> > I'd expect to see it at least one time printed without \unfoldRepeats. > >> > > >> > Anyway, here my coding so far, what do I miss? > >> > >> An iterator creator ? > > > > I've exactly zero experience with this topic. > > > > I tried to get some more info, we have: > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor-big-page.html#iterator-tutorial > > > > Which reads: > > " > > 10.10 Iterator tutorial > > TODO – this is a placeholder for a tutorial on iterators > > Iterators are routines written in C++ that process music expressions > > and sent the music events to the appropriate engravers and/or > > performers. > > See a short example discussing iterators and their duties in > > Articulations on EventChord. > > " > > Not that enlightening... Admittedly there a some more hints spread over CG. > > Though, right now I'm not even sure, if it's possible in scheme at all. > > > > Is there any scheme-example? > > In scm/define-music-types.scm I read > > (RepeatedMusic > . ((description . "Repeat music in different ways.") > (types . (repeated-music)) > )) > > so it would appear that the default iterator should actually work as > intended if you fill the expression in the usual way (element containing > the main stuff, elements containing the alternatives).
Not sure, if this is the case yet. I'll check tomorrow evening (hopefully) Too late ... Good night and thanks, Harm > Unless > RepeatedMusic is not actually being used. No idea. > > -- > David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond