Aaron Hill <lilyp...@hillvisions.com> writes:
> On 2022-05-24 7:40 am, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>> Because there is now a command called \section, so this
>> is trying to set a key inside a music function, which is
>> not an alist ... This is unfortunate but unavoidable.
>
> Would it be practical for LilyPond to detect and warn when a built-in
> is being redefined?
Why?
> Granted, one thing I really like about LilyPond is that one can easily
> redefine things as needed. But would it be burdensome to require a
> little bit of extra syntax that makes clear the user's intention to
> redefine something that already exists?
Why?
>
> %%%%
> \version "future"
>
> foo = { c2 } % Works, providing \foo does not exist.
> bar = { c4 4 } % Warns, since \bar does exist.
Why would that warrant a warning? What is the problem you try warning
about?
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
