>> Thank you so much for the speedy and clear response. I didn't
>> consider that it was because the notehead styles were different!
>> Glad for the understanding.
>
> Maybe there'd be a way for the implementation to check for the same
> glyph instead? For styles with considerable overlap of glyphs, that
> may be a more appropriate choice?
>
> Or isn't there actual glyph overlap?
For the Emmentaler fonts, there are overlaps in the used glyphs,
AFAIK. However, this might be different for other SMuFL fonts. (I
haven't actually checked, though.)
Werner
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
