Werner, I think the remaining question is how common is this as a style? (I find many examples in books but few online :) and does that warrant adding an additional staff type?
I'm very happy with the outcome here. My thanks to all involved, particularly Dan. I do wonder if there's a way to make the horizontal spacing.. 'nicer' but it's certainly functional for all my purposes as is. Grant. On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 4:53 PM Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: > > >> However none of the staff types dan suggested will do what I could > >> previously do. Gregorian divisiones not supported on modern staffs > >> is a reasonable closure for this as a bug however I've previously > >> been able to use the gregorian divisions on a 'normal staff' so > >> from my pov this is a regression. > > > > Does either of these suit your purpose? [...] > > The whole issue probably warrants an improvement of the documentation, > helping users in the transition to the new syntax. > > Grant, assuming that Dan's code in his last reply fits your needs, can > you suggest a better wording (in the 'v2.25' documentation)? > > > Werner >
