Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > that double copy is bothering me; I would really like to reopen a > finished object for further growth without having to use temporary > storage. Any thoughts on the matter? Is this worth taking up with > glibc?
Might be. How much would it change/slow down the existing code to add a new interface to do what you want? _______________________________________________ Bug-m4 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-m4
